• @SIGSEGV@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    That’s so weird, then, that it’d be so radically different than it is on Android. Why do you think that is?

    • Zagorath
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Is it radically different? It’s a feature that iPad OS supports that the iPhone version of iOS doesn’t, and I don’t think Android does (though I’ve not used an Android tablet in nearly 10 years, so maybe tablets on Android can do it?). Obviously desktops all support multiple windows and have done forever. Technically, by not having implemented this feature it actually means it’s more similar to Android.

      Firefox is rather under-resourced in terms of developer power, and they’ve been consistently prioritising other things rather than implementing this feature. I don’t think there’s much more to it than that. It’s a perfectly reasonable explanation for why they haven’t done it—any team needs to prioritise what they work on. But it’s also reasonable for a user who values that feature to choose a competitor that has delivered it over one that has not. That’s the natural trade-off.

      • @SIGSEGV@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I’m dumb, and had to reread what you wrote. I thought you meant tabs this whole time (doh). I haven’t even used an iPad before, so I didn’t know that feature existed. I don’t believe I’ve ever seen multiple windows of Firefox on Android (but you can have multiple apps open side-by-side).

        I think it is unlikely Mozilla would support that feature, given the lack of resources and demand; iPad’s are niche.

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Yeah and that’s fine. I’m not saying Firefox is evil for not having this feature or anything like that. I’m merely explaining why it is that I find it to be a sub-par option, and why I choose Edge instead, for the moment.