A statement from a Google employee, Dov Zimring, has been released as a part of the FTC vs Microsoft court case (via 9to5Google). Only minorly redacted, the statement gives us a run down of Google’s position leading up to Stadia’s closure and why, ultimately, Stadia was in a death spiral long before its actual demise.

"For Stadia to succeed, both consumers and publishers needed to find sufficient value in the Stadia platform. Stadia conducted user experience research on the reasons why gamers choose one platform over another. That research showed that the primary reasons why gamers choose a game platform are (1) content catalog (breadth and depth) and (2) network effects (where their friends play).

“However, Stadia never had access to the extensive library of games available on Xbox, PlayStation, and Steam. More importantly, these competing services offered a wider selection of AAA games than Stadia,” Zimring says.

According to the statement, Google would also offer to pay some, or all, of the costs associated with porting a game to Stadia’s Linux-based streaming platform to try and get more games on the platform. Still, in Google’s eyes, this wasn’t enough to compete with easier platforms to develop for, such as Nvidia’s GeForce Now.

    • @Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1010 months ago

      The “pay for sub then buy games on top of that” was 100% how I heard it worked and NEVER heard anything different from anywhere.

      That’s kinda nuts.

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        710 months ago

        It was basically true.

        There was a bad experience version you could use without a subscription to games you purchased outright, and they included “free” games with your subscription, but to get a reasonable experience you had to pay for both.

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          010 months ago

          The subscription was only necessary if you wanted to play in 4K or wanted “free” monthly games. Everything else worked just fine without the sub, with no change to performance.

          • conciselyverbose
            link
            fedilink
            310 months ago

            The subscription was absolutely required for performance not to be a complete dumpster fire.

            The free tier wasn’t mediocre. It was unplayable.