• @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1299 months ago

    A significant portion of this blog post is complaining about Mozilla’s repeated attempts to find new revenue streams that aren’t Firefox. It’s a sentiment I see a lot and I just don’t get it.

    They complain about Google paying to be the default search provider being a bad thing, and yet when Mozilla says “yeah, we hear ya, that’s why we’re trying to find stuff to diversify into” people cry and shout “you should be sticking to Firefox, why aren’t you focussing on Firefox??”

    Like, which is it? Do you want Mozilla to diversify and have a more sustainable revenue stream, or do you want them to focus on Firefox and commit to reliance on Google? Because maintaining a project as big as Firefox without any funding simply isn’t possible.

    I’m not sure that what these people want is at all realistic. Devs want to be paid for their work.

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’m okay with Mozilla trying to diversify their source of incomes, as long as it’s focused on privacy. Firefox Relay is a great example of a paid service that helps preserving some privacy and I gladly pay for it.

      I hope they’ll make more privacy-focused optional services like that. If it helps paying for Firefox continued development while detaching from Google then it’s a good idea.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
        link
        fedilink
        English
        69 months ago

        They’ve got some pretty interesting stuff in the pipeline, like container tabs optionally being hooked up to their own independent Mozilla VPN connection.

        IMO I think they’re going to go all in eventually offering a kind of “privacy ecosystem” similar to Proton

    • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      89 months ago

      Like, which is it? Do you want Mozilla to diversify and have a more sustainable revenue stream, or do you want them to focus on Firefox

      Presumably these are different people.

      • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Of course they spend it on more than just Firefox. What part of “we’re trying to diversify” don’t you understand?

        And I’m sorry, Lunduke is not a trustable source. He went seriously off the deep end years ago.

        From a great Linux content creator to a crazed Qanon, COVID conspiracy anti-vaxx nut trying to pedal all kinds of nonsense, who loves to shit on LGBT Linux devs. I really don’t know what the hell happened to him.

        • @gens@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It is hard to draw conclusions without knowing much facts. How much is needed and how much is got.

  • @hoot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    659 months ago

    How do rambling blog articles full of terrible assumptions and analysis like this get posted? Is there an alternative technology community I could sub to that cares about quality content?

    • @EatYouWell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      249 months ago

      Amen. It would be nice to have posts on actual technology instead of business/financial news about technology companies, or what shitty CEOs are doing in their personal lives.

    • @LifeInOregon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      169 months ago

      This is why I block users who share garbage after the first few times I notice it. For example, this will be the last post I see from OP.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    English
    179 months ago

    I’d like to have the same kind of bonuses when I don’t meet my KPIs

  • Dariusmiles2123
    link
    fedilink
    English
    99 months ago

    I’ll never understand how someone can get paid like that. If Mozilla was destroying the opposition, I’d get it though.

  • @psychothumbs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    This is the real problem with these Silicon Valley fads like crypto and AI - they cause idiot tech executives to disinvest in their worthwhile products in an attempt to get on the bandwagon.